Keynote speech for Dr. Helder Da Costa
“Redefining Global Security: Climate action, peace, and critical role of g7+ Nations”
Climate Integrity Summit 2025
Wednesday, 12 February 2025
Parliament House, Canberra, Australia
Dr. Richard Denniss, Executive Director, The Australia Institute
Honorable Members of Parliament
Excellencies, Distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen.
On behalf of the g7+, its members, and leadership, I extend my deepest gratitude
to the Australia Institute for the opportunity to share our perspectives on global
challenges that disproportionately affect the most vulnerable nations, including
those within the g7+ group.
To provide context, the Group of Seven Plus, or g7+, is an intergovernmental
organization of 20 countries spanning different regions, united by a shared vision
of achieving lasting peace and stability.
This vision is not aspirational but rooted in the lived experiences of nations that
have transitioned from multiple crises toward stability and development.
To realize this vision, we advocate for effective national and international policies
centered on long-term stability, resilience, and self-reliance. These include
principles such as national ownership, inclusive politics, and accountability—
2
fundamental to building sustainable peace and development
These principles were formally embedded in the New Deal for Engagement in
Fragile States, a framework agreed upon in 2011 with international partners,
including Australia and other OECD donors and civil society organizations. This
framework was shaped by the real experiences of our member countries,
providing a foundation for more effective collaboration in overcoming fragility
When the g7+ was established in 2010, global discourse largely focused on fragility, extreme poverty, and conflict. The world’s major powers were engaged in the so-called Global War on Terrorism. Climate change, while increasingly recognized, was not as central to international discussions as it is today. The Paris Agreement had not yet been signed, and the full impact of escalating geopolitical tensions was yet to unfold.
However, many g7+ countries in the Global South continued to struggle with the
legacies of colonialism and Cold War-era interventions, including civil wars,
extremism, and economic instability
However, while global headlines painted a picture of relative stability in the world
due to any direct confrontation between global powers, many g7+ and other
Global South countries continued to struggle with the legacies of colonialism and
Cold War interventions. Civil wars, extremism, and economic hardships
remained endemic.
Few, if any, of these nations had achieved even a single benchmark under the
Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). In 2010, Haiti was devastated by a
catastrophic earthquake. South Sudanese were still fighting for their right to selfdetermination. Afghanistan was grappling with severe insurgencies, claiming
hundreds of innocent lives daily. Timor-Leste, my own country, was still
recovering from civil unrest. These, as few examples represent the wider realities
3
that stood in stark contrast to the notion of a peaceful world.
Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen,
Today, the world is navigating an era of “polycrises”—a term that encapsulates
the interconnected nature of climate change, geopolitical tensions, economic
instability, and rapid technological advancements, including artificial
intelligence. While global challenges transcend borders, their impact is
disproportionately severe in fragile states, which lack the resilience to absorb
shocks.
Crucially, these vulnerabilities are not inherent characteristics of our
nations but rather the result of explicit and implicit actions of powerful
global actors. Colonization, foreign interventions under the guise of the Cold
War, resource exploitation, and geopolitical maneuvering have left deep scars on
fragile states.
Take climate change as an example. Developed countries—despite making up a
small fraction of the world’s population—have historically been the largest
contributors to CO₂ emissions since the Industrial Revolution. Their pursuit of
unchecked industrialization has driven the world to the brink of
environmental entropy. What is even more alarming is that, despite clear
scientific evidence, many of these nations continue to deflect responsibility for
their disproportionate role in this crisis.
The consequences of climate change caused by such explicit actions of
industrialized nations are disproportionately severe for fragile and conflictaffected states. Rising sea levels, prolonged droughts, and extreme weather
events are compounding existing vulnerabilities, leading to displacement, food
insecurity, and heightened risks of conflict.
Climate-related disasters have displaced millions, exacerbating hunger and
4
poverty in fragile contexts. Due to weak institutions, lack of needed resilience,
people in these places are disproportionately affected. Increasingly frequent and
severe climate hazards threaten to worsen poverty, hunger and displacement, and
can lead to protracted crises which will make it even harder to cope with crises.
The resulting pressures would place an unsustainable burden on an already
overstretched global humanitarian system. According to the IMF, under a highemissions scenario, conflict-related deaths as a share of the population in fragile
countries could rise by nearly 10% by 2060 if current trends continue. Pacific
nations, including some g7+ members, are among the most affected. Some
island nations face existential threats due to rising sea levels, and many
others struggle with the increasing frequency of climate-induced disasters.
In my own country, the tropical Cyclone Seroja passed close to the coast of
Timor-Leste on 4 April 2021 and the slow-moving storm brought heavy rain that
caused floods and landslides, leaving a dozen of people killed and approximately
10,000 people were affected.
Countries in Africa such as Somalia and South Sudan are highly exposed to
severe climate events, including droughts, floods; tow opposite extremes.
These events have precipitated school shutdowns months in 2024 in South
Sudan
The inequality in climate change is not just about who contributes the most to the
problem—it extends to the way the world responds to it. Climate action, intended
to mitigate and reverse the impact of climate change, is itself marked by injustice.
Wealthy and stable countries have the resources to shield themselves from the
worst consequences of natural disasters.
Meanwhile, vulnerable nations, particularly those in the g7+, lack the means
5
to cope with climate-induced catastrophes. In fragile states, the impact of
these crises lingers far longer than in resilient economies. The aftermath of
a flood in Spain, for instance, is vastly different from that in South Sudan.
In other words, we were deprived of the opportunity to catch the train of
Renaissance, industrialization, modernization, and economic
development—and we missed that journey. Now, as the world moves toward
climate adaptation, artificial intelligence, and resilience-building, we risk being
left behind once again.
If this trajectory continues, Yuval Noah Harari’s prediction—that a large
portion of humanity will become irrelevant—will materialize first in us: the 1.5
billion people of fragile and conflict-affected states.
This is not mere rhetoric; it is a harsh reality we are already confronting.
Addressing it requires collective global action. Our call is not just about human
solidarity; it is about shared prosperity, stability, and the future of all
nations.
As a collective, the g7+ plays a crucial role in advocating for climate justice by
amplifying the voices of fragile and conflict-affected states in global climate
negotiations. The g7+ attempt to ensure that the global climate policies are
tailored to address the unique challenges faced by fragile states—such as weak
governance, limited infrastructure, and recurring conflicts—which often prevent
6
them from effectively responding to and recovering from climate shocks.
Moreover, the group actively pushes for increased and easy and flexible access
to climate finance that is both predictable and accessible, emphasizing the need
for simplified funding mechanisms that consider the realities of fragile contexts.
By fostering solidarity among its members and engaging with international
partners, the g7+ strives to bridge the gap between climate action and
peacebuilding, ensuring that climate resilience efforts contribute to long-term
stability and sustainable development
As part of our collective advocacy, we recently issued a joint letter calling for
increased access to climate finance, streamlining the bureaucracy, and localizing
the execution of climate finances. The letter that was sent to UN Secretary
General, World Bank President, IMF and presidencies of COPs was featured in
more than 90 medial outlets
Against this backdrop, I would like to leave you with four key points as our
collective aspiration:
First: While international affairs have long been driven by Realpolitik, leading
to geopolitical and geoeconomic competition, contemporary global challenges—
especially climate change—demand a paradigm shift. Human solidarity must
replace narrow national interests in shaping global discourse and action. The
“we first” approach adopted by developed nations will only exacerbate these
crises.
In our quest for globalization, the world remains deeply interdependent, making
the principle of “no one is safe until everyone is safe” more relevant than ever.
Developed countries bear a disproportionate responsibility for many of the global
crises we face today, particularly climate change. Given their historical
contribution to environmental degradation, they must lead the way in reversing
7
the damage.
The G20 nations, which collectively account for 75% of global greenhouse gas
emissions, hold the power to set ambitious, 1.5°C-aligned climate targets for 2030
and achieve net-zero emissions by 2050. If these targets are met, global warming
could be limited to 1.7°C, offering a critical opportunity to preserve the 1.5°C
goal.
However, achieving this must be done with genuine climate integrity. This
requires a commitment to transparent, robust action—not through double
standards or short-term solutions that undermine trust and slow progress. Only
through authentic and sustained efforts can we hope to address the climate crisis
and ensure a sustainable future for all.
Second: There is a significant gap in climate adaptation, with least developed
countries—particularly those affected by conflict and fragility—falling far
behind in the global race to build climate resilience. These nations face a dual
challenge: not only do they lack the financial resources and infrastructure needed
to adapt, but they are also disproportionately impacted by climate-induced
disasters that they had little role in causing
Currently available adaptation finance remains woefully inadequate
compared to the actual needs of these vulnerable nations. Recognizing this,
the g7+ has made a collective plea for adaptation finance to be doubled by 2026,
though even this increase would cover only 60% of what is required. The gap
highlights the urgent need for equitable access to climate finance and a
fundamental shift in global funding priorities.
Additionally, global efforts to push forward climate adaptation without due
consideration for fragile countries—many of which rely heavily on revenues
from natural resources such as gas and oil—can be a double-edged sword.
The rapid transition away from fossil fuels, while necessary for global
sustainability, is already pushing several resource-dependent economies deeper
into economic fragility. Without alternative revenue streams, economic
diversification strategies, and tailored support, these countries risk being left
behind, further exacerbating instability and poverty.
Therefore, our countries need support in our efforts to diversify economies and
build climate resilience.
The need to transform to climate-resilient development – in which climate change
mitigation and adaptation are integrated with sustainable development – is
particularly urgent in these fragile and conflict-affected situations (FCAS)
Third: The current geopolitical and geoeconomic fragmentation among global
powers has severely impacted poorer nations, particularly those that have long
relied on the solidarity of the international community. Many conflict-affected
and fragile states are once again being used as battlegrounds for competing
political and economic interests, caught in the crossfire of a renewed struggle for
global influence. Instead of genuine support for their development and stability,
these nations are increasingly subjected to transactional engagements, where
assistance is driven by strategic calculations rather than long-term partnerships.
This replicates the Cold War era, whose legacy continues to cast long shadows
over many fragile states, leaving behind instability, economic stagnation, and
deep-rooted divisions. We must not allow history to repeat itself.
We urge the international community to move away from short-term,
transactional, interest-driven engagements and instead build genuine partnerships
based on mutual respect, trust, and shared prosperity
Fourth and Final: Australia, as a neighbor and a global actor, has an integral
role to play in supporting the fragile nations, particularly those in the Pacific. As
a developed nation with unique geographic proximity and shared interests in the
Pacific, Australia’s support can significantly contribute to building resilience in
these countries. This includes financial commitments to climate adaptation,
promoting sustainable economic development, and strengthening the capacity of
Pacific nations to respond to crises—both natural and man-made.
Australia’s long-standing relationship with the region, coupled with its leadership
in international forums, positions it as a key partner in fostering peace, stability,
and prosperity in the Pacific and beyond.
Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen,
Peace, stability and shared prosperity in the world rest in peace and stability
in conflict affected countries as much as it is contingent in the actions of the
mighty powers. The path forward demands us to take responsibility—not only
for our own actions but for the collective well-being of humanity.
Recognizing this fact, the g7+ is committed to working with Australia and the
global community to forge a future where no nation is left behind, especially
those most vulnerable to the twin crises of climate change and geopolitical
instability. Through solidarity, partnerships, and shared determination, we can
ensure that every nation, regardless of its size or fragility, has the opportunity to
thrive.
We must act now, not just for the benefit of the fragile states, but for the stability
and security of the entire global community.
Thank you.